A “budget” under-sink water filter, or a low cost water filter, can be one of the best home upgrades for everyday drinking water filtration—if you’re buying it for the right reason.
In most homes, what matters is this: an under-sink filter is about convenience and better-tasting water, not turning questionable water into lab-grade water. Some budget systems do real contaminant reduction, but many are mainly aimed at chlorine taste and odor. That’s not a bad thing—unless your goal is “deep removal.”
This guide is written to help you make a confident first decision: which type of budget under-sink filter makes sense for your water, your cabinet space, and your tolerance for ongoing filter costs.
Who this is for / who should avoid it
If you’re trying to figure out whether an under-sink filter is actually worth your time, this section will help you decide. It breaks down who benefits most and who might be better off skipping it.
Decision Snapshot (Rule of Thumb)
You should buy a best budget under sink water filter if you have treated municipal water and mainly want better taste and less chlorine smell, offering affordable water filtration that delivers real value for your money, and a cleaner setup than a pitcher on the counter.
You should not buy a budget under-sink filter if your goal is RO-level contaminant reduction (or you’re shopping mainly by lab charts and want the strongest numbers).
It only makes sense if you can install it without major plumbing changes, especially if you rent or you don’t have a handy shutoff valve under the sink.
You should avoid RO systems (even “efficient” tankless ones) if you’re highly eco-focused and don’t want any meaningful wastewater from filtration.
You should buy a budget under-sink filter if your main problem is bad taste/chlorine odor from municipal water
If your water comes from a city supply and it smells like a pool, you’re in the “best-case” group for a low cost under-sink filter.
What I’ve seen in real homes: when people complain about “bad water,” it’s often not a health emergency—it’s the everyday annoyance of chlorine taste, odd odor, and water that makes coffee or ice cubes taste off. A basic under-sink carbon-based system usually fixes that in a way that feels immediate.
This is also where affordable water filtration, via a low cost water filter, is most honest. You’re paying for:
-
better taste and smell
-
good flow in the sink
-
less clutter than pitchers and countertop units
You should avoid it if you need RO-level contaminant reduction (or you’re choosing purely based on lab numbers)
If you’re on a private well, or concerned about contaminants like nitrates, arsenic, or microbial pathogens, a simple budget under-sink filter may not provide sufficient protection. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), well owners are responsible for testing and treating their water to ensure safety EPA, Ground Water & Drinking Water.
This is where buyers get tripped up by marketing words like “removes toxins” or “advanced filtration.” Those phrases can mean almost anything. If your decision is based on “I want the strongest removal I can get,” you’re typically talking about reverse osmosis (RO), and RO usually isn’t the cheapest path—either upfront or long-term.
Also, if you’re choosing purely by lab numbers, budget systems can disappoint because:
-
some don’t publish clear test results for your exact concern
-
some are tested for taste/odor standards, not the contaminants you care about
It only makes sense if you can install it without major plumbing changes (especially in rentals)
A budget filter stops being “budget” when you need a plumber, special adapters, or drilling.
Most under-sink installs are doable for a careful DIY homeowner. Where people usually run into trouble is not the filter—it’s the sink setup:
-
no working shutoff valve under the sink
-
older or odd pipe sizes
-
corroded fittings that don’t want to loosen
-
very tight cabinets where you can’t fit your hands and a wrench
If you rent, you also have the “reversibility” issue: your landlord may not want you drilling the counter for a dedicated faucet.
Avoid if you’re highly eco-focused and worried about RO wastewater (even “efficient” tankless RO still wastes some water)
RO is effective, but it works by flushing away a portion of water to carry contaminants out. Even modern, more efficient designs still waste water—often less than older systems, but it’s not zero.
If you’re in a drought-prone area, on a septic system you’re trying to baby, or you simply don’t like the idea of wastewater as a trade-off, this matters. In some independent tests, some “efficient” tankless RO units still land around roughly 0.75 gallons wasted for every 1 gallon purified (ratios vary by model, temperature, pressure, and how the unit is tuned).
For eco-first households, a simple carbon under-sink filter (non-RO) can feel like the more aligned choice.
Core trade-offs that actually affect the decision
Not all under-sink filters are created equal, and knowing the main trade-offs—like taste vs deep contaminant removal—can save you money and frustration. Here’s what really matters when choosing between budget options.
Taste/odor wins (chlorine) vs “deep removal” (RO): what you’re really paying for
Most people shopping “best budget under sink water filter” are trying to solve one of two problems:
-
“My water tastes/smells bad.”
-
“I’m worried about what’s in my water.”
A standard non-RO under-sink filter (usually carbon-based) is built for problem #1. It can also reduce some contaminants, but its strongest “everyday win” is chlorine and odor.
RO is built for problem #2. It targets a broader range of dissolved contaminants that carbon alone may not touch well.
Here’s the practical point: taste improvement is usually cheap; deep removal is usually not. If you pay budget prices but expect RO outcomes, you’ll feel like the filter “did nothing,” even if it’s working as designed.
Non-RO under-sink vs RO under-sink: the two budget paths that lead to different outcomes
If your budget is tight, there are two common paths:
Path A: low cost non-RO under-sink
-
Pros: lower upfront cost, simpler installation, no wastewater, usually faster flow
-
Cons: not intended for RO-level reduction; performance depends heavily on certification and maintenance
Path B: “budget RO” under-sink
-
Pros: broader contaminant reduction potential, often the strongest “peace of mind”
-
Cons: more parts, more space needs, wastewater, can be slower, ongoing costs can be higher
A lot of regret comes from choosing Path A when you secretly wanted Path B. The reverse can happen too: people buy RO, then get annoyed by wastewater, space, and the “system feel” when all they really wanted was better taste.
Tankless vs tank-based: speed, footprint, and the hidden trade-off of wastewater ratios
If you go RO, you’ll run into tank-based vs tankless.
Tank-based RO
-
Stores filtered water in a small tank
-
It tends to be easier to live with if you want quick fills (large bottle, cooking pot)
-
Often takes more cabinet footprint because you’re fitting a tank plus filters
-
Wastewater ratio varies, and older designs may waste more
Tankless RO
-
No storage tank; filters on demand
-
Can save space in some cabinets and looks cleaner
-
Often needs electricity
-
Wastewater ratio can still be meaningful (it’s not “waste-free”), and performance depends more on water pressure and temperature
The hidden issue is that buyers focus on gallons-per-day ratings, but day-to-day happiness often comes down to:
-
how fast it fills a glass when you’re in a hurry
-
whether it fits without blocking your trash can or cleaning supplies
-
whether your pressure is high enough for the promised flow
Is best budget under sink water filter overkill if a pitcher already fixes the taste?
Sometimes, yes.
If a basic pitcher already makes your water taste fine and your main annoyance is just “I forget to refill it,” then an under-sink filter is mainly a convenience upgrade.
The cheapest way to filter tap water is usually:
-
a simple pitcher filter, or
-
a faucet-mounted filter (if it fits your faucet style)
So when does under-sink stop being overkill?
-
when you want better flow (pitchers can be slow)
-
when you drink a lot of water daily (families, athletes, big coffee/tea households)
-
when you want less plastic clutter and less fridge space taken up
-
when you’re tired of “is the pitcher refilled?” arguments
If you rarely drink tap water or you already keep a pitcher in the fridge without hassle, staying with a pitcher is a rational move.
Cost, budget, and practical constraints
Before you buy, it’s worth understanding the real costs beyond the sticker price. Replacement cartridges, filter life, and household usage all affect whether a “cheap” filter stays cheap.
Upfront price vs true annual cost: replacement filters, schedules, and what “affordable water filtration” really means
People ask: Can I get a good under-sink filter for under $100?
Sometimes you can, but you need to read “good” the right way. Under $100 often buys you:
-
a basic under-sink carbon filter setup
-
decent taste and chlorine reduction
-
a system that may require more frequent cartridge changes
Where “affordable” becomes misleading is when the filter is cheap but replacements are expensive—or when the replacement schedule is optimistic.
A realistic way to think about cost and affordable water filtration is:
-
Upfront hardware cost (one-time)
-
Replacement cartridges (ongoing)
-
Any add-ons you didn’t expect (adapters, a new shutoff valve, a dedicated faucet)
Does a low price mean more frequent filter changes? Often, yes. Not always, but it’s common. Smaller cartridges, lighter media, or less surface area can mean shorter life—especially in water with lots of sediment or strong chlorine.
The budget trap is focusing on “under $100 today” and ignoring that you may spend that again every 6–12 months.
“Value for money RO” vs low cost non-RO: when spending more actually reduces regret
If you’re torn between “low cost water filter” and “value for money RO,” the real question is: what will annoy you more 3 months from now?
-
If you buy non-RO and you still worry about contaminants, you may end up buying RO later (paying twice).
-
If you buy RO but you hate the space loss, install complexity, or wastewater, you might stop using it or ignore maintenance.
Spending more reduces regret when:
-
you have a specific contaminant concern and want stronger reduction potential
-
Your household drinks a lot of water and you want a system that keeps up
-
you’re the kind of person who will maintain it on schedule (RO punishes missed maintenance more)
On the other hand, a basic non-RO under-sink filter is a smart “first step” if your main problem is taste and you want the simplest system that people actually keep using.
What changes your cost the most: household gallons/day, local water quality, and filter lifespan uncertainty
Three real-world factors swing your yearly cost more than most people expect:
-
Daily water use A single person filling a bottle twice a day is not the same as a family that cooks at home, fills water bottles, makes ice, and runs a coffee maker nonstop.
-
Local water quality Even within municipal water, chlorine levels, sediment, and seasonal changes affect filter life. If your filter clogs early, your “annual” replacement becomes a twice-a-year replacement.
-
Lifespan uncertainty (marketing vs reality) Filter claims are usually based on ideal conditions. If your water has more particles, your pressure is low, or you use more gallons than the estimate, you’ll replace sooner.
This is also where people wonder: Are cheap water filters safe and effective? They can be, but “safe and effective” depends on:
-
whether the materials are reputable and tested
-
whether the system is certified for the claim it’s making
-
whether you keep up with replacements (an overdue filter can become a nuisance fast)
Visual: simple cost-range table (upfront + estimated yearly replacements) for low cost water filter vs budget RO
Below is a plain-range estimate to help you sanity-check “affordable water filtration” costs. Real costs vary by cartridge pricing, your water, and how often you replace.
| Type | Typical upfront cost range | Typical yearly replacement range | What this usually buys you |
| Low cost non-RO under-sink (carbon-based) | $60–$180 | $40–$150/year | Strong taste/odor improvement; limited “deep removal” unless certified for specific claims |
| Direct-connect under-sink (no dedicated faucet) | $80–$220 | $50–$160/year | Similar to non-RO, often easier for rentals; install depends on faucet/line compatibility |
| Budget tank-based RO | $180–$450 | $80–$200/year | Broader reduction potential; needs space for tank; produces wastewater |
| Budget tankless RO | $250–$600 | $100–$250/year | Faster on-demand feel; may need electricity; wastewater still exists (ratio varies) |
If your plan is “I want the cheapest way to filter tap water,” the table should make something clear: under-sink is rarely the absolute cheapest, but it can be the best day-to-day experience for the money once you factor in convenience.
Fit, installation, or real-world usage realities
Even the best filter won’t help if it doesn’t fit under your sink or if installation turns into a headache. This section walks through what can go wrong and how to avoid it.
Will this fit in a small under-sink cabinet (especially under 18 inches deep)?
Under-sink cabinets look roomy until you try to add a filter and still keep:
-
a trash bin
-
cleaning supplies
-
maybe a pull-out drawer
-
maybe a disposal unit and drain plumbing
If your cabinet is under about 18 inches deep, you need to be picky. Common fit problems:
-
filter canister hits the cabinet wall, so you can’t twist it off for changes
-
RO tank blocks the trash bin
-
you can’t mount anything because the sides are thin or crowded with pipes
A practical tip: measure three things before you buy:
-
depth (front to back)
-
clear vertical height where a canister would hang
-
free floor space if you’re considering RO with a tank
If you can’t easily reach the filter to change it, maintenance becomes the thing you dread—and that’s how “affordable” systems end up unused.
Renters: direct-connect options that use the existing faucet vs systems needing a dedicated faucet hole
Renters usually need one of these:
-
a system that connects to the cold-water line and feeds the existing faucet (direct-connect), or
-
a setup that can be removed cleanly later
Systems that require a dedicated filtered-water faucet often need drilling (countertop or sink). Even if it’s “just one hole,” that can be a lease violation.
Direct-connect is appealing for rentals because it can be reversible. The trade-off is that compatibility matters more:
-
Some faucet setups are not standard
-
pull-down faucet hoses can complicate routing
-
tight spaces make it harder to secure lines so they don’t kink
If you’re renting, the decision is less about “best filtration on paper” and more about “what can I install and remove without drama.”
What happens if your water pressure is low (under ~40 PSI)?
Low pressure changes everything, especially for RO.
If your home pressure is under around 40 PSI, common symptoms include:
-
slower flow at the filtered tap
-
RO systems making water very slowly
-
more wastewater in some RO designs (because pressure affects efficiency)
You can check pressure with a simple gauge on an outdoor spigot. In apartments and older homes, low pressure is more common than people think.
If you already hate how slowly your kitchen faucet runs, adding filtration can push you from “annoyed” to “why did I buy this?”
Installation time reality check: when it’s truly “a breeze” vs when you’ll lose 15–30 minutes (no shutoff valve, pipe types)
Many under-sink filters are genuinely DIY-friendly, especially when:
-
You have a working shutoff valve under the sink
-
Fittings are standard and not corroded
-
You have room to work
That’s when installs feel like “a breeze.”
Where people usually lose time (or end up at the hardware store):
-
the shutoff valve is missing, stuck, or leaks when turned
-
The cold-water line is rigid (less flexible to tap into)
-
you have old compression fittings that don’t match modern adapters
-
You realize you need thread tape, a better wrench, or a different tee fitting
If you’re not comfortable touching plumbing at all, budget for a handyman. Even a low cost water filter stops being “low cost” if installation turns into a service call.
How to choose the best budget under sink water filter for your water
Once you know your “why” and practical limits, it’s time to pick a system that fits your needs. This section gives the guidance to make a choice that actually works day-to-day.
Start with your “why”: taste/odor fix, general filtration, or RO-level purification goal
This is the decision that drives everything else.
If your “why” is taste and chlorine: A non-RO under-sink carbon-based system is usually the simplest win.
If your “why” is general filtration and you want some verified reduction: Look for systems with clear certifications for specific contaminants (more on that below). You may still stay non-RO, but you’ll shop more carefully.
If your “why” is RO-level purification: Choose RO and accept space, waste, and maintenance realities. This is where “value for money RO” can make sense if it prevents “upgrade later” regret.
A quick reality check: many people don’t need RO to feel happy with their water. They need their water to taste normal every day.
Certifications vs claims: what to look for when comparing budget filters (and when it’s OK if data is limited)
People also ask: Are budget filters NSF certified? Some are, some aren’t. And “NSF certified” can mean different standards. According to NSF International, NSF/ANSI 42 certification addresses aesthetic effects like chlorine taste and odor, NSF/ANSI 53 covers specific health-related contaminant reduction, and NSF/ANSI 58 is the standard used for reverse osmosis systems NSF, Water Filters & Testing.
A budget system can still be useful without a long list of certifications if your only goal is taste/odor. But if you’re buying because of health concerns, certifications matter more than marketing claims.
When it’s OK if data is limited:
-
you’re on city water
-
your main complaint is chlorine taste/odor
-
you’re not relying on it to solve a known contaminant problem
When it’s not OK:
-
You have a known issue (lead risk in older plumbing, nitrates, arsenic, etc.)
-
you’re on well water
-
you’re buying to reduce health-related contaminants and want proof, not hope
If you’re unsure what’s in your water, start with your local water quality report (for municipal water) and consider a basic test if you’re on a well.
Match system capacity for daily usage: single person vs family peak times (5+ gallons/day)
Capacity isn’t just “how long the filter lasts.” It’s also:
-
whether the flow stays decent during peak use
-
whether the system becomes a bottleneck when you cook
A single person who drinks 2–3 liters/day is usually fine with almost any under-sink system.
A family can hit 5+ gallons/day faster than you think:
-
cooking pasta + rinsing produce
-
filling multiple bottles
-
making coffee/tea
-
filling pet bowls
-
topping off ice makers (if you also use filtered water for that)
If you’re a higher-usage household, prioritize:
-
higher flow (especially non-RO)
-
realistic replacement cost and availability
-
cartridges that don’t require constant attention
This is where “budget” can backfire if the system needs frequent changes. Frequent changes don’t just cost money—they cost patience.
Visual: decision checklist mapping “water problem + constraints” to non-RO, tankless RO, or direct-connect
Use this like a quick map, not a rulebook:
| Your main situation | Your constraints | Best-fit type to consider first |
| City water, bad chlorine taste/odor | Want simplest setup, no wastewater | Non-RO under-sink (carbon-based) |
| City water, want cleaner taste + rental-friendly install | No drilling, easy removal | Direct-connect under-sink (uses existing faucet) |
| You want broad contaminant reduction and accept complexity | Space available, okay with wastewater | Tank-based RO |
| You want RO results but hate big tanks | Have power outlet, decent pressure | Tankless RO |
| You already like your pitcher’s taste | Mostly convenience issue | Consider staying with pitcher or faucet filter |
If two options seem to fit, let installation limits decide. In real homes, compatibility and maintenance drive satisfaction more than small differences in claim lists.
Maintenance, risks, and long-term ownership
A filter is only as good as you maintain it. Here we cover what to expect in terms of replacements, leaks, and keeping your filtered water tasting great over time.
Is it still affordable after 6–12 months? (Replacement frequency is the cost buyers underestimate)
This is the part buyers underestimate the most.
A system can be “cheap” and still be a poor deal if:
-
replacements are pricey
-
replacements are needed more often than expected
-
replacement filters are hard to find (or frequently out of stock)
If you’re trying to keep water filtration low cost, calculate:
-
what you’ll spend in the first year (system + replacements)
-
what you’ll spend in years 2 and 3 (replacements only)
Also, expect that your first replacement timing might surprise you. If your water has sediment, your filter may clog sooner than the box suggests. When that happens, you’ll notice flow dropping before taste changes.
Subscription/auto-delivery (e.g., reminder programs) vs manual tracking: which prevents lapses for busy households
Busy households often do better with reminders or subscriptions because maintenance is easy to forget.
Manual tracking works if you:
-
like calendars and reminders
-
don’t mind ordering parts when the time comes
-
keep a spare cartridge
Subscriptions work if you:
-
hate “admin tasks”
-
tend to push maintenance off
-
would rather pay slightly more than risk forgetting
Neither is “better” in a vacuum. The right choice is the one that keeps you replacing filters on time.
What happens if you delay replacements: taste returning, flow changes, and why real-world long-term feedback is limited
If you delay replacement, the most common real-world signs are:
-
chlorine taste and smell slowly return
-
flow rate drops (especially if sediment is present)
-
you start ignoring the filtered tap because it’s annoying to use
Many product pages and quick reviews focus on day-one taste changes. Fewer people come back after 9–12 months to report what changed. So you should assume:
-
Maintenance matters more than early impressions
-
Your water conditions will decide the real lifespan
-
“set it and forget it” is not realistic long term
Risk management: leaks, pressure drops, and what to test right after installation (and again after a few weeks)
Under-sink filters are usually safe when installed correctly, but leaks are the risk that actually ruins your day.
Right after install, do a simple leak check:
-
dry everything with a paper towel
-
run water for several minutes
-
check every connection with dry tissue (it shows moisture fast)
-
check again 30 minutes later
Then check again after a few weeks. Small slow leaks can appear after pressure cycles and temperature changes.
Also pay attention to pressure/flow:
-
If flow drops fast, your cartridge may be clogging early (sediment issue) or the valve isn’t fully open.
-
If your faucet sputters, you may have air in the line (common after installs; usually clears).
If you’re worried about lead from old plumbing, consider testing filtered water after installation and again later. It’s the simplest way to confirm your system is doing what you bought it for.
Final go/no-go: when this is the right “affordable water filtration” move
This is your reality check. We’ll sum up when it makes sense to buy a budget under-sink filter for affordable water filtration, a low cost water filter, or when a value for money RO system might be the smarter choice, and when you might be better off reconsidering.
Buy now if your top priority is better tasting water with minimal hassle and no RO complexity
This is the “quality of life” case: you want clean-tasting water at the sink without babysitting a pitcher. If that’s you, focus on:
-
fit under your sink
-
replacement cost you can live with
-
certifications that match your goal (often taste/odor)
Pause and reconsider if your constraints are space, low pressure, rental restrictions, or sustainability concerns
This is where most disappointment comes from:
-
there isn’t enough cabinet space to service the system
-
pressure is low, so flow becomes annoying
-
you can’t drill and direct-connect won’t fit your faucet setup
-
you don’t want RO wastewater but keep comparing yourself into RO anyway
If these constraints apply, you may be happier with a pitcher, faucet filter, or a different under-sink style than you first imagined.
If you’re torn: the 3-question tie-breaker (water goal, install limits, ongoing cost tolerance)
Ask yourself:
-
What am I solving—taste or safety concerns? If it’s taste, non-RO is usually enough. If it’s safety concerns, shop by certifications and consider RO if needed.
-
What installation am I truly willing/allowed to do? If drilling or plumbing changes are a “no,” that narrows your choices fast.
-
What ongoing cost won’t annoy me in 6 months? If you’ll resent frequent replacements, pick a system with realistic cartridge life and easy availability—even if the upfront cost is a bit higher.
Before You Buy checklist (5–8 items)
-
Measure your under-sink space (depth, height, and clearance to remove a cartridge) so you don’t buy a system you can’t maintain.
-
Check whether you have a working shutoff valve under the sink; if not, plan for extra time/cost.
-
Confirm your water pressure (especially if considering RO); low pressure can mean slow flow and worse real-world performance.
-
Decide if you can drill a faucet hole; if you rent or can’t drill, focus on direct-connect options.
-
Look for certifications that match your goal (taste/odor vs health-related reduction) instead of relying on broad marketing claims.
-
Estimate first-year cost (system + likely replacements) so “budget” doesn’t turn into surprise spending.
-
Plan how you’ll track replacements (subscription/reminder vs manual) so you don’t run the filter far past its useful life.
-
Do a leak check plan: paper towel test right after install and again a few weeks later.
FAQs
1. Can I get a good under-sink filter for under $100?
Yes, you absolutely can get an under-sink filter for under $100, but here’s the thing—you’ve got to be realistic about what you’re buying. At that price point, most systems are aimed at taste and odor improvements—think chlorine smells gone, water tastes fresher. They’re not going to magically remove every contaminant like a full RO system would.
Also, cheap doesn’t always mean “set it and forget it.” Some of these filters have smaller cartridges, so you might need to replace them more often than the marketing suggests. So if your goal is just “make tap water taste good” and you’re on city water, under $100 is totally doable. But if you’re looking for “deep clean” like RO-level filtration, you’ll probably need to up your budget.
2. Are cheap water filters safe and effective?
They can be, especially if your goal is simple stuff like better taste or removing chlorine. Most cheap carbon-based under-sink filters are made with food-safe materials, and some even have NSF certifications for taste/odor improvement (NSF/ANSI 42).
The catch isn’t usually the filter itself—it’s maintenance. If you forget to replace the cartridge, the filter can clog, slow down your flow, or even start affecting taste negatively. And if the filter claims “removes all toxins” but doesn’t have certifications, you really can’t take that claim at face value. So yes, safe and effective is possible, just don’t ignore replacement schedules.
3. What is the cheapest way to filter tap water?
Honestly, if your main concern is cost, the cheapest routes are usually pitcher filters or faucet-mounted filters. They’re super easy to set up, no under-sink installation, and replacements are usually inexpensive.
Under-sink filters cost more upfront, but they give you better flow, less clutter on your counter, and no need to refill a pitcher all the time. So it’s really a trade-off between low cost vs daily convenience. For someone who drinks a lot of water or wants a clean sink setup,the under-sink can feel like money well spent.
4. Does a low price mean more frequent filter changes?
Often, yes. Many budget filters have smaller cartridges or lighter filter media, which can clog faster, especially if your water has a lot of sediment or high chlorine levels. So a $60 filter might technically “last 6 months” in marketing terms, but in real life, you could be replacing it every 3–4 months if your water is heavy on particles.
A good tip is to check the replacement interval and also look at the ongoing cost. Sometimes a slightly more expensive filter lasts twice as long, which can actually save money and hassle over a year.
5. Are budget filters NSF certified?
Some are, some aren’t. Here’s the breakdown:
-
NSF/ANSI 42 → taste and odor (chlorine, mustiness)
-
NSF/ANSI 53 → specific health-related contaminants (like lead, cysts)
-
NSF/ANSI 58 → reverse osmosis systems
For a budget filter, if your main goal is just taste and chlorine smell, you don’t need every certification. But if your concern is health-related contaminants, you should definitely look for at least ANSI 53 or 58. If the box says “removes toxins” but doesn’t list a standard, treat it with skepticism.
References