Reverse Osmosis Wastewater Ratio Guide: Compare 1:1 vs 1:4 RO Systems – Frizzlife

If you’re shopping for a reverse osmosis (RO) water filter, the wastewater ratio is the detail that decides whether you’ll love the system—or quietly resent it.

In plain terms, the reverse osmosis wastewater ratio tells you how much “reject” water goes down the drain for every gallon of purified drinking water you collect. A traditional under-sink RO might waste 3–4 gallons of water to make 1 gallon of purified water (a 1:3–1:4 product-to-waste situation). In the worst case, you could be dumping four gallons of wastewater for every gallon you drink. Newer “water saving RO” designs can get closer to a 1:1 waste ratio under the right conditions.

But the number on the box is not the number you’ll live with. In real homes, the wastewater ratio moves based on water pressure, water quality (TDS), and water temperature. And even when the ratio is great, people still get surprised by slow fill times, maintenance, and the reality of handling RO drain water.

This guide is here to help you make a confident first decision: what type fits your home, what “low waste RO system” claims are real, and what headaches to avoid.

Who this is for / who should avoid it

Choosing a low-waste reverse osmosis (RO) water system isn’t a one-size-fits-all decision—its value hinges on your daily water usage habits, home setup, budget priorities, and willingness to handle basic maintenance. Below is a clear, no-nonsense breakdown of who stands to benefit most from investing in a low-waste RO system, who should hold out for a true 1:1 waste ratio (and the conditions that make it viable), and who is better off skipping RO entirely for simpler, more practical water filtration options. This snapshot cuts through the technical jargon to help you align your purchase with what your home and lifestyle actually need.

Decision Snapshot (Quick Answer)

You should prioritize a low-waste RO system if you use RO water every day for drinking + cooking, you care about reducing water waste (or you pay high water/sewer rates), and you can handle either a drain connection (under-sink) or a reject-water container (countertop).

You should only chase a true 1:1 waste ratio if your water pressure is strong (or you’re willing to add a booster pump), your tap water isn’t extremely high TDS, and you’ll stay on top of filter/membrane maintenance so the ratio doesn’t drift.

You should not buy RO (low-waste or not) if you mainly want “better taste” fast. A good carbon filter, faucet filter, or pitcher is often simpler, faster, and cheaper.

You should not buy a system that produces reject water if you can’t realistically manage the RO drain water (no drain access, no space to place/empty a wastewater tank, or you’re in a rental where setup is limited).

You should prioritize a low-waste RO system if you use RO water daily (cooking + drinking) and feel guilty about water waste

In most homes, what matters is volume. If you’re making coffee, filling water bottles, cooking pasta, washing produce, and giving kids water all day, you can easily hit 5–10+ gallons/day of RO water.

At that point, “traditional RO systems waste three to four gallons” per gallon purified isn’t just a fact—it becomes a daily annoyance:

You notice it on your conscience (and sometimes your water bill).
You start thinking about your water supply during drought restrictions.
You realize you’re sending a lot of usable water straight to the drain.

That’s the homeowner who usually feels immediate relief from a lower wastewater ratio.

You should only chase a 1:1 waste ratio if your water pressure is strong (or you’ll add a booster pump) and you’ll maintain it

A 1:1 waste ratio sounds like the perfect answer: one gallon of wastewater for one gallon of clean drinking water.

Where people usually run into trouble is assuming 1:1 is guaranteed. In real use, “1:1” often depends on:

Feed pressure (many homes are not as high as the lab condition)
Tap water TDS (more dissolved solids usually means more reject water)
Cold water (winter water can reduce output and efficiency)

Also, efficient RO designs tend to be less forgiving if you neglect maintenance. When prefilters clog or the RO membrane is scaling, systems often lose performance. That can mean more wastewater production, slower flow, and worse water quality.

Avoid if you mainly want “better taste” and speed—non-RO filtration may fit better

RO is not the fastest way to get better-tasting water.

If your main complaint is chlorine taste or odor, a carbon-based water filter often fixes that without:

waiting for purified water in a tank,
dealing with RO reject water,
replacing multiple stages and a membrane.

RO is best when you want a bigger jump in water quality (especially dissolved contaminants), not just taste.

Avoid if you can’t deal with reject water / ro drain water handling (no drain access, no place to dump a wastewater tank)

Every RO system has a place where the reject water goes:

Under-sink: to a drain saddle on your sink drain line (or to a standpipe)
Countertop units: into a wastewater tank you must empty

If you don’t have an easy drain connection, or you don’t have a realistic habit for dumping a wastewater tank, the system becomes “that appliance you’re always dealing with.”

This is one of the most common fit problems I see in small kitchens and rentals: the filtration works, but the daily routine doesn’t.

Is reverse osmosis wastewater ratio worth it if your tap water is already decent?

If your tap water is already good and you’re not dealing with specific concerns (like high TDS, salty taste, or local contaminant issues), then chasing the best wastewater ratio may not be the best first move. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), safe drinking-water should not contain any chemical or microbiological contaminants that pose a health risk. If your local water report indicates elevated levels of specific contaminants (such as nitrates, arsenic, or lead), a reverse osmosis (RO) system can be an effective choice for targeted reduction.

Two reasons:

You might not need RO at all to hit your goals (taste and basic clarity).
Even a very efficient RO system can feel like “work” compared to a simple carbon filter.

If you’re on the fence, start by testing your tap water (TDS and basic water report review). That tells you whether you’re solving a real problem or just upgrading because RO is popular.

What reverse osmosis wastewater ratio should you target for your home?

With claims of 1:1 waste ratio to traditional 1:4, choosing a target can be confusing. The right wastewater ratio isn't the lowest number you see—it's the one that fits your water pressure, tap water quality, and how much drinking water you actually use. Let’s break down what each range means for real-life water use.

Choose a traditional RO (about 1:3–1:4) if you want lower upfront cost and can accept water waste

A traditional RO system (often tank-based under the sink) is still common because it’s usually the lowest upfront price. Many homes live with 3–4 gallons of waste water per gallon of filtered water.

This can be a reasonable choice when:

Your household RO use is low (a couple gallons/day).
Water is cheap where you live (and you don’t mind the waste).
You want a simpler setup that many plumbers are familiar with.

The trade-off is straightforward: you’re paying less for the RO unit, but you accept higher water usage over time.

Choose an efficient RO (about 1:2) if you want a middle-ground on cost, waste water, and performance

If you’re trying to reduce water waste without turning the purchase into a whole project (booster pumps, extra monitoring, special routines), the “middle” efficiency range is often the sweet spot.

A roughly 1:2 wastewater ratio tends to work for more homes because it’s less dependent on perfect conditions than 1:1 claims, but still cuts waste in a way you can feel.

In real life, this is often where homeowners land when:

they use RO water daily,
they want better efficiency,
but they don’t want a system that’s picky.

Choose a 1:1 waste ratio system only if your feed water conditions match the claim (pressure, TDS, temperature)

A true 1:1 waste ratio is possible, but it’s not magic. It’s usually a combination of:

strong feed pressure (or a booster pump),
a membrane and flow control designed for higher recovery,
and water conditions that cooperate.

If your home has low water pressure, very cold water part of the year, or high TDS, the system may still work—but your real wastewater ratio can slide away from 1:1.

So if you’re buying mainly because of the ratio, you want to treat the claim like “up to” mileage on a car: meaningful, but dependent on conditions.

When a “low waste RO system” claim is mostly marketing (and what to verify)

If you want to avoid disappointment, verify these three things before you buy:

Rated recovery conditions: Does the product explain the assumed pressure (psi), temperature (often 77°F), and TDS?
Daily production and flow rate: If the system is efficient but produces water slowly, you may still hate using it.
How reject water is handled: “Low waste” doesn’t mean “no waste.” Where does the RO drain water go in your kitchen?

If a listing only says “water saving” without the test conditions, treat the wastewater ratio as unknown until you confirm.

Core trade-offs that actually affect the decision

The wastewater ratio is a key number, but it’s not the only factor you’ll live with. A water saving RO system might cut down on waste, but if it makes your clean water trickle out too slowly, you’ll feel the trade-off every day. Here, we look beyond the specs to the real compromises between efficiency, speed, taste, and convenience.

Water savings vs filtration speed: why low-waste systems can still feel slow day-to-day. This is a key shift from traditional reverse osmosis systems, which often prioritized simple, faster tank refills over efficiency.

Many buyers assume a more efficient RO system will also be faster. Sometimes it is, but not always.

In fact, some low-waste designs feel slow because:

They protect the membrane by controlling flow,
they run flush/rinse cycles,
they may produce water steadily but not quickly.

So you can have a “water saving RO” that still makes you wait when you want to fill a pot or multiple bottles. If you’ve ever tried to pull a few liters quickly and realized you’re getting a thin stream, you know how this feels.

A practical way to think about it:

Wastewater ratio affects your conscience and long-term water use.
Flow rate affects your daily patience.

You want both to be acceptable.

Water quality vs taste: RO removes minerals (pH/taste shifts) unless remineralized

Reverse osmosis works by forcing water through a semipermeable membrane that blocks many dissolved solids. That’s why RO can reduce TDS dramatically.

But it also changes taste. RO water can taste “flat” because minerals are reduced. Some people also notice pH shifts (often reading lower because the water has less buffering and can absorb carbon dioxide from air).

If taste matters a lot, pay attention to whether the system:

adds minerals back (remineralization), or
leaves you with very low TDS water.

This isn’t about “good” or “bad.” It’s about what you and your family will actually drink happily.

Convenience vs “hands-on” tasks: tank filling, ro reject water, and dumping routines

RO isn’t typically “set it and forget it,” especially if you go countertop or you pick a system with containers.

Hands-on tasks can include:

filling a feed tank,
emptying a wastewater tank,
waiting through long initial flush cycles,
and doing periodic filter swaps.

Some homeowners don’t mind a routine. Others get tired of it fast.

A good question to ask yourself: Do I want an appliance, or do I want a small water project on my counter? Both can produce clean water. Only one fits your tolerance.

Is this overkill for your situation compared to pitchers, carbon filters, or bottled water?

If your main goal is “I want clean tasting water” and your local water report is decent, RO can be more than you need.

Common alternatives that feel easier day-to-day:

Carbon pitcher or dispenser filters (taste/odor)
Faucet-mounted carbon filters (convenience)
Under-sink carbon + sediment (higher flow, less maintenance than RO)
Bottled water (convenient, but ongoing cost and plastic handling)

RO tends to win when you care about dissolved contaminants and want consistent quality for drinking water and cooking. If you don’t, the wastewater conversation may be the wrong problem to solve.

Cost, budget, and practical constraints

Let’s talk about the real cost of a low waste RO system. It’s more than the upfront price of the RO unit. You need to factor in the long-term expense of filtered water—including replacement filters, potential booster pumps, and the impact on your water bill. We’ll show you when investing in efficiency pays off, and when a simpler filtration system might be smarter for your wallet.

Upfront price reality: why higher-efficiency RO often starts at $500+ (and what you get for it)

Higher-efficiency RO systems cost more because they often include:

more advanced pumps or controls,
better monitoring,
higher-performance membranes,
and sometimes leak protection or automated flushing.

You’re paying for:

better recovery (less waste water),
sometimes better consistency in water quality,
and often a more “appliance-like” experience.

That said, higher price does not automatically mean better fit. A cheaper traditional RO can still be the right buy if you use little water and don’t mind the waste.

Ongoing cost per gallon of purified water: filters, batteries, and the true “water produced” cost ($0.11–$0.27/gal)

Most homeowners budget for filter changes, but they underestimate what that means per gallon.

In real-world ownership, your cost per gallon of purified water can land around $0.11–$0.27 per gallon once you include:

prefilters,
the RO membrane (less frequent, but pricier),
post-filters (like carbon/remineralization),
and sometimes batteries (some units use them and may need replacement around every 1–2 years).

This cost range shows up for people who track usage and replace filters on schedule. If you stretch replacements too far, you may save money short term but lose water quality and efficiency.

Your water bill math: what 1:4 vs 1:1 means for a household using 5–10+ gallons/day

Let’s make the wastewater ratio real with simple math. Focusing on home water efficiency has a real-world impact. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) shows that household use constitutes a significant portion of public water supply, making the efficiency of water-using appliances an important part of conservation.

Assume you produce 10 gallons/day of purified water:

At 1:4 (traditional RO): you send about 40 gallons/day to the drain as RO wastewater.
At 1:1: you send about 10 gallons/day to the drain.

That’s a difference of 30 gallons/day.

Over a month (30 days), that’s 900 gallons saved. Over a year, 10,950 gallons saved.

Now translate that into money:

If your combined water + sewer cost is, for example, $0.01–$0.02 per gallon (varies a lot), that’s roughly $110–$220/year difference.
If your rates are lower, savings shrink.
If you’re in a high-rate area, savings grow.

Even if the dollar savings aren’t huge, many homeowners still care because it reduces water waste.

When paying more for water saving RO does NOT pencil out (low usage, cheap water, light cooking)

A higher-priced efficient RO often doesn’t make sense when:

You only drink a gallon or two per day.
You mostly drink other beverages and rarely cook with filtered water.
Your water is inexpensive and you’re not bothered by drain water waste.
You’re likely to skip maintenance (efficiency drops anyway).

In those cases, the “best” wastewater ratio can be a distraction. Your real win might be a simpler filtration system with better flow and lower ongoing cost.

Fit, installation, or real-world usage realities

A great wastewater ratio on paper means little if the RO system doesn’t fit your kitchen or lifestyle. Will you handle RO drain water via a drain connection under the sink, or by emptying a waste water tank? This section covers the practical hurdles of space, water pressure, and setup that often surprise new owners.

Under-sink vs countertop RO: space, drilling, and how ro drain water is handled

Under-sink RO

Pros: No tanks on the counter, uses a drain connection, can feel built-in.
Cons: Needs cabinet space, usually needs a drain saddle install, sometimes a faucet hole (or adapter).

Countertop RO

Pros: Often no plumbing changes, easier for renters, quick to set up.
Cons: You must manage containers—both purified water and wastewater—so you need space and a dumping routine.

Where does the drain water from RO go?

Under-sink: to your sink’s drainpipe, just like dishwasher discharge.
Countertop: into a wastewater container you empty into a sink, toilet, or other approved drain point.

Will this work in a small apartment / rental with limited space and no easy drain?

It can, but you should be honest about your setup.

Apartments usually run into one of these issues:

No permission to drill a faucet hole.
Tight cabinet layout.
No good place to store extra tanks.
Limited counter space near an outlet.

If you can’t connect to a drain and you don’t want to empty a wastewater tank frequently, RO may become frustrating fast.

Water pressure and flow: if you’re below ~40–50 psi, expect worse wastewater ratios unless you add a booster pump

This is one of the biggest “why doesn’t my system match the claim?” reasons.

RO depends on pressure to push water molecules through the membrane. If your pressure is low:

production slows,
the system operates longer to make the same amount of water,
and the wastewater ratio usually gets worse.

A booster pump can help in many homes by raising membrane pressure, which can:

increase purified water production,
reduce waste water per gallon produced,
improve consistency.

Does a booster pump reduce wastewater?

Often yes, because higher pressure improves recovery. But it’s not a guarantee of 1:1. You still have TDS and temperature limits.

Setup friction buyers underestimate: flush cycles taking 1+ hour (repeated), plus time-per-glass realities (0.03–0.04 GPM)

RO systems often require flushing:

during initial setup,
after filter changes,
sometimes multiple times.

It’s not hard, but it’s time. I’ve seen homeowners plan a “quick install” and then realize the system needs extended flush cycles before the water tastes normal.

Also, some systems dispense slowly—sometimes around 0.03–0.04 gallons per minute at the tap in certain modes. That can mean many minutes to fill a container.

If you hate waiting for water, you need to treat flow rate as a must-check spec, right alongside the wastewater ratio.

How your water conditions change the real reverse osmosis wastewater ratio (not the box claim)

How much water your reverse osmosis system will actually produce (both clean and waste) depends heavily on what’s in your water supply. Your tap water’s temperature, TDS level, and pressure directly impact how the RO system operates. We’ll explain why your real-world water waste might be higher than advertised and how to predict it.

The 3 inputs that swing recovery: pressure, TDS, and temperature (and why 77°F matters)

Most published RO performance numbers assume something like:

a certain pressure (often around typical city pressure),
77°F feed water,
moderate TDS.

Why 77°F matters: warmer water moves through the membrane more easily. When water is cold, it’s harder for water molecules to pass, so production drops and efficiency can slide.

The three big inputs:

Pressure: higher pressure usually improves recovery and output.
TDS (total dissolved solids): higher TDS usually means more reject water.
Temperature: colder feed water reduces production and often worsens ratio.

High TDS (>500 ppm) scenarios: when recovery drops ~20% and waste water rises

If your tap water TDS is high (commonly seen with hard water, well water, or certain municipal supplies), the RO membrane has to work harder to separate dissolved solids.

In practice, higher TDS often leads to:

lower recovery (less purified water per gallon in),
more RO reject water,
faster membrane scaling risk (depending on hardness and chemistry).

A rough expectation many homeowners find: when TDS is high, real recovery can drop by something like 20% compared to ideal conditions, and the amount of wastewater rises.

If you’re in this situation, don’t buy an RO system based on the best-case wastewater ratio alone. You want a design that can handle your water quality without constant babysitting.

Low temperature feed water: slower water molecules to pass, lower efficiency, more reject water

Winter water can be surprisingly cold, especially in northern climates or when plumbing runs through unheated spaces.

Cold feed water can cause:

slower tank fill,
reduced daily production,
and worse wastewater ratio (more time flushing reject water to keep the membrane stable).

If you’re buying a system because you want a great waste water ratio year-round, pay attention to whether the unit is designed to maintain performance in colder conditions—or accept that winter performance may drop.

What to test first (tap water TDS + pressure) to predict your real gallons of wastewater per gallon

Before you buy, two quick tests tell you more than most reviews:

Tap water TDS (ppm) using a basic meter
1. This helps you predict how hard the membrane will have to work.
Water pressure (psi) using a hose bib gauge
1. This helps you predict recovery and flow.

With just those two numbers, you can make a smarter call:

If pressure is low, plan for a booster pump (or don’t chase 1:1).
If TDS is high, expect more wastewater and more attention to maintenance.

This is also the best way to sanity-check marketing claims for “low waste RO system” performance.

Maintenance, risks, and long-term ownership

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notes that the performance of any water treatment device depends on its maintenance. For RO systems, regularly replacing pre-filters to protect the membrane is key to ensuring it continues to remove contaminants effectively.

Buying a water-saving RO system is the first step; keeping it running efficiently is the long-term commitment. Neglecting maintenance doesn’t just hurt water quality—it can cause your wastewater production to creep up. Here’s what you need to know about filter changes, membrane care, and hidden costs to protect your investment and your water savings.

Keeping a low waste ratio over 2–3 years: prefilters, RO membrane health, and flow restrictor effects

The RO membrane is the star, but the prefilters do the dirty work. When prefilters clog, pressure drops across the system. Lower pressure at the membrane usually means:

less purified water produced,
more wastewater,
and slower flow.

Also, many systems rely on a flow restrictor on the waste line to control how much water goes to drain versus through the membrane. If the restrictor is not matched to the membrane, or it gets fouled, your wastewater ratio can drift.

If you want stable performance for 2–3 years, plan on:

changing prefilters on schedule,
monitoring output quality (even simple TDS checks),
replacing the membrane when rejection falls.

What happens if you don’t maintain it: ratio drift, slower flow, worse water quality, and more wastewater production

Neglected RO systems often fail in a way that’s easy to miss at first:

You notice it takes longer to fill.
You notice more drain flow.
The water starts tasting “off” (sometimes flat, sometimes odd).
You stop trusting it.

This is also how you end up with the worst of both worlds: more water waste and lower water quality.

If you buy RO to avoid contaminants, maintenance is part of the deal. If you know you won’t keep up with it, a simpler water filtration method may be the smarter choice.

Hidden ownership costs: battery replacements (~1.5 years), module swaps, and 11+ minute post-change flushes

Some modern RO units include monitoring and automation that make ownership easier—until you hit the hidden costs:

Batteries in certain designs may need replacement around every 1.5 years.
Some systems use filter “modules” that cost more than standard cartridges.
After filter changes, it’s common to run a flush cycle that can take 11+ minutes (sometimes longer, sometimes repeated).

None of this is a deal-breaker if you expect it. It becomes a regret when you don’t.

What to do with ro wastewater: safe reuse cases (watering plants/cleaning) vs when to avoid it

Can you use RO wastewater for plants? Sometimes—but be careful.

RO reject water is not sewage. It’s your tap water with a higher concentration of whatever was already in it (minerals, salts, and any dissolved solids the membrane rejected). Whether it’s safe to reuse depends on your source water.

Safer reuse ideas in many homes (when your tap water is not salty):

Flushing toilets (pour into bowl or tank carefully)
Cleaning floors or outdoor surfaces
Washing bins or tools
Watering salt-tolerant outdoor plants occasionally (not ideal for sensitive houseplants)

Avoid or limit reuse when:

Your water is high salinity (some regions, some wells) — it can harm soil and plants.
Your tap water has known contaminants you’re trying to avoid — you don’t want to concentrate and spread that water around living areas.
You have delicate houseplants — many dislike mineral-heavy water.

If you’re mainly buying to reduce water waste, reuse can help—but it doesn’t remove the need for a realistic routine. A bucket you never empty becomes its own problem.

Before You Buy checklist (5–8 items)

Can you measure (or estimate) your water pressure at the kitchen supply, and is it ~40–50 psi or higher? If not, are you willing to add a booster pump?
What is your tap water TDS (ppm), and is it over ~500 ppm (higher chance your real wastewater ratio will be worse than claimed)?
Do you have a clear plan for RO drain water: drain connection under-sink, or space and habit to empty a wastewater tank?
Are you buying RO for a real need (contaminant reduction / high TDS), not just taste? If it’s mostly taste, would a carbon filter meet the goal faster?
Do you have space for the system you want (cabinet clearance for under-sink, or counter space + containers for countertop)?
Are you comfortable with slow fill times if the system produces water gradually? (Think: filling pots, bottles, ice makers.)
Will you follow a maintenance schedule (prefilters, membrane, post-filters), even when life is busy—so the wastewater ratio and water quality don’t drift?

FAQs

1. Why do RO systems waste so much water?

Think of the RO membrane like a super-fine sieve that needs to stay clean to work. When water is forced through it, dissolved minerals, salts, and contaminants get left behind and stick to the membrane surface. To prevent this gunk from building up and clogging the membrane—which would ruin it fast—every reverse osmosis system needs a steady stream of water to constantly "rinse" or flush those rejected solids away. This reject water, which is now more concentrated with those impurities, has to go somewhere, so it's sent down the drain. The wastewater ratio basically tells you how much of this rinsing water is needed to produce a certain amount of clean drinking water. Without this flushing action, the RO membrane would fail quickly, so a certain amount of water waste is a necessary part of how reverse osmosis works.

2. What is a good waste-to-pure water ratio for a home RO system?

A "good" ratio really depends on your home's setup and your priorities. For most people, an efficient RO system in the range of about 1:2 (one gallon of wastewater for every two gallons of purified water) is a solid, realistic target. It offers meaningful water savings compared to a traditional RO, which often runs at 1:3 or 1:4, without being overly sensitive to perfect water conditions. A true 1:1 waste ratio is achievable, but treat it like a high-efficiency claim for a car—it usually requires strong water pressure, moderate tap water quality (not super high in minerals), and diligent maintenance to hit that number in daily use. Don't just buy for the best number on the box; buy for the number you're likely to get in your kitchen.

3. How can I reduce RO wastewater at home?

You have a few practical levers to pull. First, maintenance is key: regularly changing your prefilters keeps water pressure strong at the RO membrane, which helps it operate efficiently. If your home has low pressure, adding a booster pump can be a game-changer—it pushes water moleculesthrough the membrane more effectively, which often improves recovery and reduces wastewater production. Also, make sure your system has the correct flow restrictor installed on the drain line; this little part controls the flush rate. Finally, be smart about your water use: if you don't need ultra-pure water for everything, use filtered water from a simpler carbon filter for tasks like washing veggies, and save the RO water for drinking and cooking. Every gallon of purified water you don't needlessly produce saves gallons of wastewater.

4. Does a booster pump reduce wastewater?

In most cases, yes, a booster pump can help you save water and reduce your system's wastewater ratio. Here’s why: Reverse osmosis relies on pressure to force water passes through the membrane. When incoming water pressure is low, the system operates sluggishly; it takes longer to produce clean water, and more water gets channeled to the drain simply to keep the membrane rinsed. A booster pump increases that pressure, helping the RO system recover more drinking water from every gallon that enters the RO unit. This means you get more water produced for your household water use and send less water down the drain as RO reject water. It's not a magic bullet for a 1:1 waste ratio, but it's one of the most effective ways to improve the efficiency of the RO system in a typical home.

5. Can I use RO wastewater for plants?

You can, but you have to be cautious. RO wastewater, or reject water, isn't dirty sewage; it's your original tap water with a higher concentration of whatever the RO membrane removed—things like minerals, salts, and nitrates. Whether it's safe for plants depends entirely on your water quality. If your water supply is already fairly hard or high in dissolved solids, the RO wastewater can be usedto stress or even harm sensitive plants and soil over time. It's generally safer to use it to waterhardy outdoor plants, use it to water lawns, or for non-plant chores like mopping floors, cleaning outdoor surfaces, or flushing toilets. A good rule of thumb: if you wouldn't drink your tap waterdue to high salinity or contaminants, don't give the concentrated waste water to your prized houseplants. For delicate indoor plants, it's often better to reduce water waste by optimizing your RO system rather than relying on reuse.

References

https://www.usgs.gov/search?keywords=water+conservation

https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water

https://www.who.int/health-topics/water-sanitation-and-health